It's not a secret ingredient, and I'm done treating it like one — what changes, and what doesn't, when a solo studio builds with AI.
For a while I danced around this. If someone asked how I build sites, I'd talk about structure, hand-written code, doing this the deliberate way since I was a teenager — all true, and none of it the whole picture. The whole picture is that AI does a lot of the actual typing now, and I'd been treating that like something to manage carefully in conversation instead of something to just say.
That was the wrong instinct, and I doubt I'm the only small studio that's had it. There's a real fear that saying "I use AI" gets heard as "I do less" or "you're paying full price for a shortcut." So the workaround is silence — build the way you always did, quietly faster, and hope nobody asks. I did that for a while. It's a bad trade. Being cagey about a tool that's genuinely useful doesn't make me look more capable. It just makes me look like I'm hiding something, which is worse.
Here's what's actually true: AI doesn't decide what your site says about your business, how the pages get organized, or what a stranger sees in the first three seconds that convinces them to stick around. I still do all of that — same discovery conversation, same structure-first thinking, same photography-led approach this whole studio is built around. What changed is how fast I can turn that thinking into working code, and how much more of my time goes to reviewing and refining instead of typing from scratch.
That's a genuine benefit, not a caveat I owe anyone an apology for. It means more of my hours go to the decisions that actually need a person, and fewer go to the parts that don't. If a tool lets me spend my time that way, not using it would be doing my clients a disservice — and not telling them would be a bigger one.
So: I use AI as part of how I build. I'm not going to walk you through every tool in the stack any more than I'd walk you through my code editor's settings — but I'm also not going to let anyone assume the site in front of them came out of a black box. Every decision is still mine. Every line still gets read and understood by me before it ships. The speed is new. The standard isn't.
Using AI isn't the shortcut clients worry it is. Hiding that I use it would have been the actual shortcut.
Execution moves faster — markup, boilerplate, first drafts of code. The discovery, the structure, the decisions about what a page needs to do: still entirely mine, same as before.
Every line that ships gets read and understood by me first. AI-assisted isn't the same as AI-unsupervised — I'd rewrite anything I can't explain, same standard I've always held.
A client who finds out later feels misled. A client who hears it upfront gets a faster build and a clearer sense of what they're actually paying for: my judgment, not my typing speed.
Tell me about your business and what you need your site to do.